<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Clinical Significance of Long-Term Psychoanalytic Treatment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://internationalpsychoanalysis.net/2009/06/10/the-clinical-significance-of-long-term-psychoanalytic-treatment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://internationalpsychoanalysis.net/2009/06/10/the-clinical-significance-of-long-term-psychoanalytic-treatment/</link>
	<description>A psychoanalytic slant on the world...with support from the American Psychoanalytic Foundation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fredmsander</title>
		<link>http://internationalpsychoanalysis.net/2009/06/10/the-clinical-significance-of-long-term-psychoanalytic-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-43396</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredmsander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationalpsychoanalysis.net/?p=5975#comment-43396</guid>
		<description>While I was neither able to read the entire study nor have the sophistication of a researcher in outcome research, the sentence on p. 11 indicating that these were not controlled samples made me wonder the following.  Clinically I believe that patients chosen for psychoanalytic treatment have some degree of &quot;analyzability&quot; and those patients deemed less optimistically are often given psychotherapy.  Comparing the two treatments would in a sense be comparing
patients with milder cardiovascular pathology treated with angioplasty with more serious 
cardiac pathology with by-pass surgery. The first group might have better outcomes suggesting angioplasty as a more successful treatment. 

My musings raise all sorts of questions about the equivalency of psychological diagnoses and physical diagnoses, the equivalency of the training of psychoanalysts and psychotherapists, a rather controversial subject these days. I&#039;l stop here as the topic is too vast and complex to do it full justice. My compliments to the authors for their efforts.

Fred Sander</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I was neither able to read the entire study nor have the sophistication of a researcher in outcome research, the sentence on p. 11 indicating that these were not controlled samples made me wonder the following.  Clinically I believe that patients chosen for psychoanalytic treatment have some degree of &#8220;analyzability&#8221; and those patients deemed less optimistically are often given psychotherapy.  Comparing the two treatments would in a sense be comparing<br />
patients with milder cardiovascular pathology treated with angioplasty with more serious<br />
cardiac pathology with by-pass surgery. The first group might have better outcomes suggesting angioplasty as a more successful treatment. </p>
<p>My musings raise all sorts of questions about the equivalency of psychological diagnoses and physical diagnoses, the equivalency of the training of psychoanalysts and psychotherapists, a rather controversial subject these days. I&#8217;l stop here as the topic is too vast and complex to do it full justice. My compliments to the authors for their efforts.</p>
<p>Fred Sander</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
