CROWDED ROOMS, EMPTY ROOMS AND EMERGENCY ROOMS: Living in Precarious Times online with IPTAR

2020/2021 CONFERENCE SERIES (VIA ZOOM): CROWDED ROOMS, EMPTY ROOMS AND EMERGENCY ROOMS Living in Precarious Times.   Wednesday April 28, 2021 — 12:00-2:00 PM – 2CE’s Dislocation of the Oppressor Within: The Unconscious Phenomenology of Race Zachary Gabriel Green, PhD

When we earnestly reflect on the challenge of addressing issues of race in psychoanalytically-informed practice, we are likely to encounter our own well-defended unconscious biases towards “the other” as well as the perilous resistance of the oppressor within ourselves to examination. This talk, based on organizational cases from contrast contexts, will explore diverse efforts by these client systems to face race. Particular focus will be given to exploration of how the phenomenology of experience contributes to ways we may promote and perpetuate systems of oppression. Implications for training and treatment will be considered.

ZACHARY GREEN, PhD is Director of Leadership Development at the Nonprofit Institute and Professor of Practice in Leadership Studies at the Continue reading CROWDED ROOMS, EMPTY ROOMS AND EMERGENCY ROOMS: Living in Precarious Times online with IPTAR

Sunday Salon at IPTAR: The Reshaping of the frame: Presence/Absence of the Body in the Psychoanalytic Encounter.”

Sunday Salon at IPTAR: Institute for Psychoanalytic Training & Research “The Reshaping of the frame: Presence/Absence of the Body in the Psychoanalytic Encounter.” Sunday April 18, 2021 Virtual Meeting: Zoom Link Available Upon Registration

—————————————————
Roundtable 4:00-6:00PM 2 CE Credits

Discussants: Tuba Tokgoz, PhD (IPTAR Member, Faculty) Jeri Isaacson, PhD (IPTAR Member, Faculty) Anna Fishzon, PhD, LP (IPTAR Advanced candidate) Moderator: Dvora Efrat, PhD (IPTAR Member, Faculty) Continue reading Sunday Salon at IPTAR: The Reshaping of the frame: Presence/Absence of the Body in the Psychoanalytic Encounter.”

The Act, Specific to Speech with Jean-Michel Vappereau online with Après-Coup

Cy Twombly, Untitled (23), 1972
\

WORKSHOP  The Act, Specific to Speech Jean-Michel Vappereau Saturday, March 27, 2021 10:30 AM – 2:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time)
To address the question of “the act of speech” in psychoanalysis, we must return to the terms “act” and “speech” starting from Freud’s discovery and Lacan’s critical commentary on it.  Suggested reading: “L’Étourdit” (1973), Autres écrits.

Jean-Michel Vappereau practices psychoanalysis in Buenos Aires, where he gives a public seminar on psychoanalysis and topology at the association Topologie en Extension; he is a professor in the Psychoanalysis Master’s program of the Universidad Kennedy in Argentina, and a Continue reading The Act, Specific to Speech with Jean-Michel Vappereau online with Après-Coup

Sexuation and Loss of Being in the Act of Speech with Paula Hochman online with Après-Coup

Carol Rama, Lusinghe (Flattery), 2003  © Archivio Carol Rama, Turin

FOUNDATIONS OF PSYCHOANALYSIS  Sexuation and Loss of Being in the Act of Speech  Paula Hochman  Friday, March 26, 2021 6:30 PM – 8:30 PM (Eastern Daylight Time)
What consequences does entering into speech have for speaking beings? Two major ones: first, sexuation of the speaking body, and second, the loss of being known as “alienation.”  We will explore these implications and their clinical impact.
Suggested readings: Freud: “Some Character-Types Met with in Psycho-Analytic Work” (1916). Lacan: Seminars, VII, 1959-60, The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, May 25, 1960; XI, 1964, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, May 27; XXIII, 1975-76, Le sinthome, 16 décembre 1975.
Continue reading Sexuation and Loss of Being in the Act of Speech with Paula Hochman online with Après-Coup

Panacea or Posion: Placebos and Nocebos in Modern Medicine at the Helix Center

Panacea or Posion: Placebos and Nocebos in Modern Medicine Saturday 2:30 PM EST 20 March 2021

Placebos “work” for quite a few medical problems. But how? And what is the work they do?

What one thinks a medicine is capable of, one’s idea of that medicine, may affect us in the way “proper” medicines do. This implies that, in observing the work of a placebo we are watching an idea affect biology, the mind moving the body.

Despite the dualist notions this description elicits, where mind and body are held as separate entities, most neuroscientists, generally of a monistic bent, welcome the challenge of the placebo effect. Most insist that placebos precisely demonstrate that the mind is one with the body. Yet, Continue reading Panacea or Posion: Placebos and Nocebos in Modern Medicine at the Helix Center